In responsive web design, designers like to ensure that browsers do not request unnecessary assets such as background images which might not get displayed. Some techniques are better than others. The article Media Query & Asset Downloading Results comes to this useful recommendation. It was recently mentioned on Twitter by the author Tim Kadlec in response to a question from Anna Debenham.
“If you want to hide a background image, your best bet is to hide the parent element. If you can’t do that, then use a cascade override (like test five above) and set the background-image to none when you want it hidden.
For swapping background images, define them both inside of media queries.”
For code examples and extended results, go to the original article.
Last Tuesday, I was in a blogging workshop presented by Stephanie Booth. She first covered the basics. Her three main points were:
- Blogs are ante-chronological websites that don’t necessarily need a rigid thematic organisation.
- They can also encourage communication between the author and the readers when the tone is right.
- When blogging software came on the scene, these solutions were the first to offer a way to publish on the web without knowing HTML.
Stephanie explained the rationale for blogging. Someone may blog to amass content for themselves and/or document their expertise in public. Both have documented benefits.
She summarized that by listing three main reasons to blog:
We quickly toured a few personal and company blogs. Then, she showed the participants how to create a post and edit it using keyboard shortcuts. She encouraged us to follow along on our own blogs.
I always admired how she seldom touches the mouse while editing. I never took the time to make link-creation keyboard shortcuts into a habit. Part of the problem is that they change for every OS/browser combination. I use three OSes and, at least, two browsers on each. It is a convenient excuse, isn’t it? But anyway… I figured it out for Firefox/Ubuntu: it’s "Start" key + Shift + A. So, I’ll save precious seconds on each link. Thanks, Stephanie
We also went through the “Preferences”. There I noticed that my blog’s time zone was set on
GMT+1 instead of
Zurich which means that it didn’t support daylight savings time as Patricia pointed out. I also realized that nested comments where active. Oh, the horror! I fixed both issues on the spot.
It was, once again, a great evening of WordPress-based conversations. She succeeded in adapting her workshop to our 40 minutes format which was in itself a challenge. Regulars as well as newcomers seemed happy. After the meetup, we had a great time at the restaurant.
Would you care to join us next time?
Plopping a big, fat style guide on a coworker’s desk and saying ‘memorize this and then write me something’ is only going to scare them off. Instead, make style guides available for reference only, and focus on teaching new writers what they really need to know. At MailChimp, our voice and tone guide is required reading, but our traditional style guide (we use the Yahoo! style guide) is not.
Kate Kiefer Lee wrote this in Writing With Experts on her blog. It is a good point about the proper place of style guides in editorial workflows.
We were just the wrong people. Lads’ mags aren’t staffed by lads. They’re staffed by middle-class graduates, some from Oxbridge, struggling wildly to guess what will appeal to a 17-year-old squaddie from Solihull. And getting it wrong, again and again. It took us six months to work out that young men liked cars.
— Sex! Girls! Meltdown! Confessions of a baffled lads’ mag editor by Michael Deacon for The Telegraph (via @Suw).
What’s immediately apparent from this quote is that some editors don’t even know anybody in their target audience. Yet, it’s not the problem. The problem is “guessing”. Even when you’re part of your target audience, you should never assume all of your audience is just like you. You should want to do a minimum of research on the side and call for resources to be allocated to more thorough research.
“Offensiveness just seemed to… happen”, writes Michael Deacon about the controversies and problems the magazine has had. Again, research and a strong content strategy may help to avoid that. Erika Hall says it best when she states that “assumptions are insults” in Just Enough Research. Editors just like any type of designers can’t offer appealing solutions or entertainment to people they know only through stereotypes.
It is never easy to point out your team’s blind spots. It might feel like undermining your boss’ grand vision. The pressure is strong to do as you’re told — especially as a young graduate with no work experience. But it is important to ensure the success of your venture. In the particular case of lads’ mags, the author of the column says himself that their circulation do not show the biggest success. No amount of research can tell you what to design or what to publish, of course. Success is never guaranteed. True insights and solid plans can help you make better decisions though.
Since I am flipping through the Yahoo! Style Guide, these days, I started wondering why Aol’s editorial practices never were the subject of publications. For example, on the Nieman Journalism Lab, we seldom hear anything from them. Apparently, I hadn’t been paying attention to the right sources. After a quick Google search, I found the “Aol Way”: a secret plan that leaked in 2011. It is a 58-page compilation of the editorial practices that the leadership at Aol wanted to force on their teams.
The Aol way relies on pressuring staff to increase keyword density and volume to lure search engine users on their properties. Their surrealist goals called for steep increases in volume and page-views through SEO and analysis of search traffic to select subjects. It didn’t address editorial quality much when in today’s competitive landscape quality and relevance should be at the centre of every content initiatives. These sentiments were shared by Dan Mitchell writing for Fortune and Mathew Ingram from GigaOM. Their analysis is worth reading and should serve as a deterrent for people intent on following the advice contained in the 2011 Aol document.
Where are they now? The fact remains that there are very few articles about their editorial strategy available online. They don’t seem to be communicating on that very much. People covering new media could be a little more inquisitive, maybe? Do they find the company’s practices irrelevant? I, sure, would like to know more about the inner workings of their digital newsrooms. Because I am curious like that. If you have insights, do share in the comments. Please.
I pride myself in being reasonably knowledgeable in the history of sciences (for an English major, I mean). Hence it is a little shameful and revolting not to be able to find a historical figure to talk about for Ada Lovelace Day and miss the deadline. It tends to show that Ada Lovelace Day remains necessary as a reminder as well as a celebration. But there is another problem, science, technology, engineering and mathematics are so pervasive that their boundaries are blurred now. Who’s to say what is in and what is out?
Recent experiences in user support have lead me to think more about a former client who inspires me. Kelly Hungerford, community manager at Paper.li, has a passion for people. She helped me produce what was, until then, my best work. These articles are still on their Community Blog. She has incredible insights into the challenges and motivations of the service’s users. I try my best to emulate the qualities that make her so in my own work.
I always knew support and community management weren’t as effortless as she made them seem. Yet, I didn’t get the full picture until I was confronted with users all the time in my own job. Getting people to adopt software is a constant challenge. Even if the tool is good, it takes patience to get them to invest in learning and change their workflows.
Support is yet a different beast. Users who contact support are often on the brink of giving up on the tool. They expect to be let down because of all the terrible support out there. It takes an enormous amount of kindness and comprehension to get through to them — in addition to the technical expertise necessary to diagnose and fix their problems. When they get timely and effective support, their attitude changes. They feel listened to and invested. I saw that at Paper.li and I aim for the same thing — always.
Technology is about people, organisations and technics — in that order. It needs a lot of diversity among the people making it to strive. We need the insights of everybody to make it work. That is why I wish you a happy belated Ada Lovelace Day.
While reading “Let’s Pretend This Never Happened: (A Mostly True Memoir)” I would take long pauses to laugh and ponder the strangeness of life. When the time to leave for a 3-day trip to Paris came, I still had 60 pages to go. It didn’t make sense to take the hardcover for such a low page-count. Yet, I wanted to know what happens next. Instead of obsessing over the book during the trip, I decided to finish in one long and laughter-filled sitting.
Jenny Lawson is a most courageous author, willing to write about subjects that most writers avoid. She manages to bring the fun out of every anecdote — even the ones that could be tragic.
All kinds of funny are woven into the pages of her book. It’s always fresh and surprising. For example, some exchanges that she transcribes between her and her husband, Victor, are surrealist delights. It’s as if the dialogue had been written by a Dadaist Aaron Sorkin. Only better. Because it never sounds “written” nor out-of-character.
While her prose appears spontaneous, this book proves — if her blog had left anybody wondering — that she’s a master writer. She plays with form, sometimes entering into a dialogue with an editor who battles to keep her on track. At other times, she embarks upon what seem to be monstrous digressions à la Montaigne but she always comes back. Unlike the French essayist, she must have thrown a whole lot of words out because there are no unnecessary ones left.
“Let’s pretend this never happened” is a celebration. Her outrageous love of language and — most importantly — life transpires between each and every line. What’s not to love about such a book? I hope there will be a sequel, soon.
Le 29 mai dernier, j’ai eu le plaisir de co-organiser une présentation sur la gestion de contenu avec WordPress dans le cadre du Geneva WordPress Meetup Group. J’ai d’abord présenté quelques bases théoriques puis Kelly Hungerford, la Community Manager de Paper.li, a raconté l’histoire du Paper.li Community Blog. Elle a eu la gentillesse d’accepter mon invitation et je l’en remercie.
Nos diapositives sont disponibles en HTML. Utilisez les flèches pour naviguer. Le groupe prend des notes lors de chaque rencontre sur TitanPad: celles de notre présentation sont assez complètes.
Je suis content d’avoir eu la chance de faire cette présentation. Une expérience à renouveler.
“Pull-quotes make for perfect shareable chunks”. This piece of insight surfaced during the Big Web Show #90. In this episode, Jeffrey Zeldman interviewed Paul Ford, the creator of savepublishing.com among many other things.
Cette étude du groupe Gfk dont parlait ZDnet.fr constituait, en 2009, une très mauvaise nouvelle pour les éditeurs de presse francophones. Le cabinet Gfk disait, en substance, que les internautes français n’étaient pas prêts à payer pour accéder à des contenus en ligne. Ainsi, les francophones vivraient dans la croyance que les contenus en ligne sont, par définition, gratuits ou financés par la publicité. Cette étude réalisée en 2009 n’est certainement plus vraiment valide. Mais la situation a-t-elle réellement changé?
Une autre étude plus récente arrive à des résultats très différents. Selon cet article du Figaro qui détaille une étude du Boston Consulting Group, les français seraient prêts à payer plus pour le contenu. En effet, les auteurs de l’étude leur ont demandés ce qu’ils estimaient payer pour leur consommation de média et ont aussi mesurés ce que les français dépensent en réalité. La différence entre ces chiffres indiqueraient un potentiel d’augmentation des dépenses.
Les méthodologies de ces études diffèrent tant qu’elles ne mesurent pas la même chose. Dès lors, on ne peut pas affirmer avec certitude que le public francophone est prêt à payer pour du contenu en ligne plus volontiers aujourd’hui qu’hier. Quiconque pourrait me donner des indicateurs plus fiables sur l’évolution de la mentalité des internautes dans les commentaires gagnerait ma reconnaissance.
L’étude dont parle le Figaro mesure un potentiel d’augmentation de dépenses. Il n’indique pas comment le réaliser ni comment des éditeurs malins pourraient en tirer avantage. Le seul point positif est que, toujours selon cette seconde étude, le public commence à avoir de plus en plus confiance dans la qualité des contenus proposés en ligne. La production de contenu se professionnalise et le fossé entre digital et analogique se ferme. Même si le marché mûrit, que les comportements changent et que les éléments techniques se mettent en place, la question fondamentale reste de savoir quels services et quels expériences offrir pour encourager les clients à délier les cordons de leur bourse.
Crédit Photo : Clearly Ambiguous via Compfight cc